|
26th October 2004, 14:39 | #1 |
|
The fieeeeeth!
__________________
Stay shook. No sook. |
26th October 2004, 14:41 | #2 |
|
heh, surprise surprise.
|
26th October 2004, 14:49 | #3 |
Objection!
|
Surprise, surprise... more trial by media.
People, it's just a depositions hearing. |
26th October 2004, 15:40 | #5 |
Pornstar
|
yes, I would also like complimentary mints in the back set please. possibly also a selection of music and/or movies
|
26th October 2004, 15:45 | #6 | |
Wireless Slacker
|
Quote:
|
|
26th October 2004, 16:14 | #7 |
Stunt Pants
|
*skips article*
That dirty guilty money taking bitch. |
26th October 2004, 16:46 | #8 | |
Objection!
|
Quote:
BTW, that incident with the police is now the subject of an inquiry -- so, you might want to wait till that's completed before delivering your wisdom. Last edited by cyc : 26th October 2004 at 16:50. |
|
26th October 2004, 16:54 | #9 |
|
Think about the operators that are at the other end. Having to put up with distressed and/or drugged/drunk people for 8hrs a day. I'd say those operators don't even last as long as a pleb on an ISP helpdesk.
|
26th October 2004, 16:59 | #10 |
Stunt Pants
|
Lightspeed,
Do not form your own opinions. Buddy. PS: The bitch is a feef. |
26th October 2004, 19:00 | #11 | |
|
Quote:
|
|
26th October 2004, 19:09 | #12 |
|
Two words:
Protect and Serve |
26th October 2004, 19:11 | #13 | |
|
Quote:
|
|
26th October 2004, 19:42 | #14 | |
Objection!
|
Quote:
Look, it's actually rather simple: Lightspeed loves to complain about people persecuting him for no reason. One just feels obliged to point out the real reason for any disquiet is that he's prone to, you know, making stupid posts and threads. Not only that, it seems okay for Lightspeed to complain about the police being unduely attacked but perfectly alright for him to do basically the same thing. Maybe what I really think is that I hate hypocrisy. |
|
26th October 2004, 20:21 | #15 | |
|
Quote:
|
|
26th October 2004, 20:52 | #16 |
|
Last time I looked there some taxi companies have 0800 numbers
The other option is, of course, not getting so drunk you can't make a phone call, making sure you have some way to call for a taxi if needed etc. You know, just the basic idea of taking some responsibility for yourself. |
26th October 2004, 20:56 | #17 |
|
Oh, I'm well aware that some taxi companies have 0800 numbers, but you'll find that several 0800s deny cellphone callers (try calling any radio station from a cellphone). I imagine that taxi companies wouldn't do this, but it is a risk.
I don't regularly go out on the town and get horsed enough not to find my way home or take care of myself... in fact, I never have. The risk remains though, so I can understand why the person called the cops for help if he had no money on his cellphone. |
26th October 2004, 21:26 | #18 | |
Huh?
|
Quote:
p.s. cyc - unduly |
|
27th October 2004, 00:18 | #19 | ||
talkative lurker
|
Quote:
Quote:
Is that where you pay for your stomach to stay on a farm for a while so you can't digest food? |
||
27th October 2004, 01:06 | #20 | |
|
Quote:
|
|
27th October 2004, 01:39 | #21 | |
Huh?
|
Quote:
Who knows, it's been ages since I've had to call one |
|
27th October 2004, 01:49 | #22 | |
|
Quote:
|
|
27th October 2004, 01:50 | #23 |
|
You're such an ass cyc. I just liked the opportunity to post a thread titled "The fieeeeeth!"
Chappel is so cool. But I'm not gonna comment on your assness beyond this, it's plain for all to see. It'd be like pointing to the sun and saying "look, it's bright!" |
27th October 2004, 01:52 | #24 |
|
Re
"Teen beaten after police refuse aid"
What a joke of a paper the herald is becoming. The Police at the time had no free cars to give this drunk a lift. I know its a tragedy that the Police were out attending fights and burglarys while this poor drunk wanted a free taxi home. God forbid people take some personal responsibility, i guess it was also the Police who supplied him with the alcohol , made him drink it and then told some guys to go and beat him up? |
27th October 2004, 04:06 | #25 |
|
I would go as far as saying most listed Taxi 0800s don't take cellphones, United Taxis in Ak changed theirs over in the last couple of months, about the only company I can think of for Ak is Corporate Cabs.
There has always been people calling 111 for taxis, however there has been an increase in the last week or so. |
27th October 2004, 08:29 | #26 | |
|
Quote:
|
|
27th October 2004, 12:06 | #27 | |
|
Re: Re
Quote:
Even if busy it should have been simple enough to get him to settle down on a seat and wait while they dealt with their prisoner issues. As near as I can tell it seems he did try quite hard to do the responsible thing.
__________________
|O-bot|-fred 'fred is not dead, fred is resurrected!' "It is only in the tales humans tell, that the hunters win in the end." |
|
27th October 2004, 12:59 | #28 |
|
yeah, that drunk sounds like an outstanding citizen to me. My question would be to you Fred is: Do you think the police have the resources to cater for those that get drunk and can't find their way home?
How long is the response time for police to a burglary or a car that's been broken into? |
27th October 2004, 13:15 | #29 | |
|
Quote:
There is such a thing as preventative action and it does seem to be something that the Police are failing to do more and more, exacerbating the problem. Whether this is purely because of a total resource shortage, attitude problem or something else entirely is hard to judge. Certainly the Piha case is a simple failiure to perform their duty. This case does smack awfully of likewise. How long would it take to seat him down and get some id or a phone number for them to call? Or have him wait for a car to become available?
__________________
|O-bot|-fred 'fred is not dead, fred is resurrected!' "It is only in the tales humans tell, that the hunters win in the end." |
|
27th October 2004, 15:01 | #30 |
|
Nice generalising Fred.
The Piha incident was a result of one or two people in a force of 8000 or so making a misjudgement with serious consequences. Immediately after the Police held an inquiry, admitted fault and promised change, how exactly does this display a 'cavalier' attitude. And now your saying that the Police are lying when they say that they were busy on a Saturday night and didn't have a car available to give a drunk a lift home? Obviously you have no clue at all about how overworked and stretched Police are especially in a place like Porirua on a Saturday night... I guess they should have diverted the cars attending burglarys, fights and domestics to become a taxi service for every drunk wanting a lift ? And then when a woman dials 111 because someones invading her home the Police can tell her that they too busy delivering drunks home to attend. Im sure the media will love that one. |
27th October 2004, 15:18 | #31 |
|
SickBo, any numbers on how many drunks actually voluntarily walk into a Police station and ask for help?
Obviously they can't help every drunk out there, understandably. But you'd have to think they'd at least be able to take someone who walks IN, aside, and give some better assistance? Plus a big FU to any and all governments, who run down the Police :/ |
27th October 2004, 15:20 | #32 | |
May contain nuts
|
Quote:
|
|
27th October 2004, 15:30 | #33 |
|
Quite a ridiculous amount, check out Auckland Central Police station on a Friday/Sat night. Its full of drunks demanding lifts home, alleging they have been assaulted by bouncers etc. And when you have 3 or less Police cars operating in the city you can see why priority has to be given to actual crime, rather than running around after drunks....
If this guy had walked in and asked to use the phone and explained his circumstances he would have been able to use it. However from the sounds of it he just walked in asked for a lift, they told him the cars were all tied up and so he left. He had plenty of chances that night to call someone, at the bar, at the petrol station etc. You chose to get drunk, its your responsibility to get yourself home. |
27th October 2004, 17:41 | #34 | |
|
Quote:
To the issue of the police, I have to agree that it isn't their duty to call up cabs and cater for drunks. Chucking them in a cell for a night is an idea, certainly, but they're not a free hotel either. In the end, the solution has already been stated: people have to take responsibility for and take care of themselves, rather than relying upon a third party. |
|
27th October 2004, 18:52 | #35 | |||||
|
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
Quote:
I am quite aware of the job Police do and I probably have more direct experience with that than you would imagine. Quote:
__________________
|O-bot|-fred 'fred is not dead, fred is resurrected!' "It is only in the tales humans tell, that the hunters win in the end." |
|||||
27th October 2004, 19:26 | #36 | |||
Objection!
|
Quote:
http://www.nzherald.co.nz/storydispl...ection=general Quote:
Quote:
Again, this goes back to what I've said on here for years: you cannot allow people to investigate themselves and expect to retain the full trust and confidence of the public. An independent and effective PCA should have powers to come in and say "Get out, we are investigating the people involved and we'll administer disciplinary proceedings if needed!". P.S. A sergeant and an officer at the Comms centre discussing Iraena's case was recorded to have used "unacceptable language" but no one has been told what this entails. The public has no right to know, apparently. Last edited by cyc : 27th October 2004 at 19:30. |
|||
28th October 2004, 02:40 | #37 | |
|
Quote:
|
|
28th October 2004, 10:47 | #40 | |
|
Quote:
__________________
|O-bot|-fred 'fred is not dead, fred is resurrected!' "It is only in the tales humans tell, that the hunters win in the end." |
|