NZGames.com Forums
Register FAQ Calendar Mark Forums Read

Go Back   NZGames.com Forums > General > Open Discussion
User Name
Password

Reply
 
Thread Tools
Old 6th May 2009, 10:26     #1
_Incubus_
 
New Star Trek Movie

I have been looking forward to this big time and have twisted the missus arm to make her go on Thursday! I'm a bit worried about this though..

http://www.theonion.com/content/vide...urce=a-section
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th May 2009, 10:30     #2
Cyberbob
 
It's been getting nothing but good reviews on RT

http://au.rottentomatoes.com/m/star_trek_11/
__________________
ɹǝʌo sᴉ ǝɯɐƃ ʎɥʇ
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th May 2009, 10:31     #3
Helious
 
I'm spending this week watching the first 6 movies on Blu Ray so I have some backround.

Very keen on this new movie.
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th May 2009, 11:17     #4
Pleb'a
 
You like the backround on your boyfriend!
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th May 2009, 11:41     #5
caffiend
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by _Incubus_
I have been looking forward to this big time and have twisted the missus arm to make her go on Thursday! I'm a bit worried about this though..

http://www.theonion.com/content/vide...urce=a-section
Are you saying you're one of those Trekkie fans they're taking the piss out of?

In other news... Bree Lindsay.

Hot.
__________________
If ignorance is bliss, why is everyone so unhappy these days?
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th May 2009, 11:52     #6
Hurtuso
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by _Incubus_
I have been looking forward to this big time and have twisted the missus arm to make her go on Thursday! I'm a bit worried about this though..

http://www.theonion.com/content/vide...urce=a-section
lol, I'm kind of opposed to the new film even though I know nothing about it except that they seem to have hired young trendy actors. This goes against what I know my mates who are trekkies would want in a Star Trek film. It's a whole new level of schaedenfreude and I'm not comfortable with it.
__________________
yadda
  Reply With Quote
Old 6th May 2009, 13:00     #7
_Incubus_
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by caffiend
Are you saying you're one of those Trekkie fans they're taking the piss out of?

In other news... Bree Lindsay.

Hot.
Not at all, I kinda gave up when the gayness that is Rick Berman fucked the whole thing up.

Agreed, Bree my new fav roving reporter!
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th May 2009, 16:31     #8
erentz
 
Rolling eyes

I have a problem with this. In the preview it shows the enterprise being built on earth, in some prairie somewhere. But in all of the other star treks (tv shows and movies) these starships are built in space and from my limited knowledge of trek-foo they aren't designed to be atmospheric vehicles. I think JJ just decided he had to have some stupid Top Gun rebel motorcycles up to the big ship scene.
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th May 2009, 16:44     #9
Reformed_Quint
 
yea, they don't look exactly aero-dynamic.
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th May 2009, 16:54     #10
Fred
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by erentz
I have a problem with this. In the preview it shows the enterprise being built on earth, in some prairie somewhere. But in all of the other star treks (tv shows and movies) these starships are built in space and from my limited knowledge of trek-foo they aren't designed to be atmospheric vehicles. I think JJ just decided he had to have some stupid Top Gun rebel motorcycles up to the big ship scene.
Err no. According to the canon the TOS era Enterprise was built at the San Francisco yards on Earth. TNG era Enterprise was built at the Utopia Planitia yards Mars. I believe Enterprise B was built at McKinley Station in Earth orbit and Enterprise C was another Utopia Planitia project.

Intrepid class, aka Voyager, are explicitly designed to land on a planetary surface and the saucer section of the Enterprise D was definitely designed to land. Both the Enterprise and Enterprise D have both entered an atmosphere and while not happy doing it generally in the episodes in question they were crashing out of control rather than landing per se.

What might be confusing you was that the refit Enterprise, first seen in Star Trek the Movie, was being serviced and refit in space at McKinley Station.

Kinda sad that I remember this shit....
__________________
|O-bot|-fred
'fred is not dead, fred is resurrected!'
"It is only in the tales humans tell, that the hunters win in the end."
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th May 2009, 17:03     #11
Rocket
 
Laugh

Jesus I have not seen anyone get so owned since WWII
__________________
Later Boltz!
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th May 2009, 17:04     #12
flic
Dee Hast Mish
 
Off to see this tonight at 9pm
__________________
In the future, everyone will be anonymous for 15 minutes
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th May 2009, 17:04     #13
Caesar
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fred
Intrepid class, aka Voyager, are explicitly designed to land on a planetary surface and the saucer section of the Enterprise D was definitely designed to land. Both the Enterprise and Enterprise D have both entered an atmosphere and while not happy doing it generally in the episodes in question they were crashing out of control rather than landing per se.

What might be confusing you was that the refit Enterprise, first seen in Star Trek the Movie, was being serviced and refit in space at McKinley Station.

Kinda sad that I remember this shit....
Heh, So what Star Trek character did you got Armageddon dressed as then?

Was there ever a Voyager episode where it landed on a planet?
The whole thing not just the saucer section, I'd be interested to know how
it does it given its shape and design.

Last edited by Caesar : 8th May 2009 at 17:06.
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th May 2009, 17:12     #14
Fred
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Caesar
Heh, So what Star Trek character did you got Armageddon dressed as then?
People pay good money to keep me out of tight form fitting outfits I'll have you know.

Quote:
Was there ever a Voyager episode where it landed on a planet?
The whole thing not just the saucer section, I'd be interested to know how
it does it given its shape and design.
Yes, but don't ask me which episode it was. I vaguely remember seeing it so it must have been an early voyager episode as I gave up on the series fairly quickly. Felt it never lived up to the core of the story the pilot established - which should have been about the hard choice between expediency and high principles when stuck out in the Delta quadrant.

One quick google later :-

http://www.star-trek-voyager.net/ship4/voyship_all4.htm

Screenshots n'all.
__________________
|O-bot|-fred
'fred is not dead, fred is resurrected!'
"It is only in the tales humans tell, that the hunters win in the end."
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th May 2009, 17:16     #15
combatspoon
 
Star Trek was effin' amazing. One of the most watchable movies I've seen in a long time. Excellent casting, and a good blend of humour and action. Also one of the most seamless movies I've seen in a long time in terms of CGI. I almost forgot for quite a while how much CGI was in it.
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th May 2009, 17:31     #16
erentz
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fred
Err no. According to the canon the TOS era Enterprise was built at the San Francisco yards on Earth...
Ah, thanks for clearing that up, now I can happily go watch it.

Oh wait I just googled it: http://memory-alpha.org/en/wiki/San_...co_Fleet_Yards

Quote:
San Francisco Fleet Yards (also known as San Francisco Navy Yards or simply San Francisco Yards) is a Starfleet shipyard located in Earth orbit, with its shore offices probably located in the city of San Francisco. There is also an orbital office complex near the drydocks of the yard.


Update: yeah in orbit, more here: http://www.startrek.com/startrek/vie...cle/70377.html

Last edited by erentz : 8th May 2009 at 17:35.
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th May 2009, 17:31     #17
Saladin
Nothing to See Here!
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Fred
Yes, but don't ask me which episode it was. I vaguely remember seeing it so it must have been an early voyager episode as I gave up on the series fairly quickly. Felt it never lived up to the core of the story the pilot established - which should have been about the hard choice between k-expediency and high principles when stuck out in the Delta quadrant.
Channelling Ron Moore again eh?
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th May 2009, 20:50     #18
Brave Warrior
Terellah Seven
 
I saw it last night. I liked it a lot... It wouldn't surprise me if there were more to come with this cast. Ahura has never looked better
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th May 2009, 22:59     #19
com
porntube.
 
IMO.

I saw it last night as well and it was alright. Full of action mixed with some funny scenes. I never liked Star Trek too much, so watching this with limited knowledge on the series, my only conclusion was that they did a pretty decent twist in order to recycle the main characters whilst getting a fresh start in making the series completely irrelevant to the original story. So i hope that this 'new' Star Trek will be more appealing for me in the future. I'd give it 7/10.
  Reply With Quote
Old 8th May 2009, 23:56     #20
Cyberbob
 
I really liked it, but it did seem like the Dir of Photography just discovered the lens flare tool
__________________
ɹǝʌo sᴉ ǝɯɐƃ ʎɥʇ
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th May 2009, 00:35     #21
Fred
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by erentz
Ah, thanks for clearing that up, now I can happily go watch it.

Oh wait I just googled it: http://memory-alpha.org/en/wiki/San_...co_Fleet_Yards





Update: yeah in orbit, more here: http://www.startrek.com/startrek/vie...cle/70377.html
I could be wrong but my recall is that they retconned that into the series. The original first series made explicit mention of the shipyards being on Earth. But kinda like the Klingon bumpy forehead the magic continuity wand was waved at some point.

As for the film, having just seen it I quite enjoyed it. Its plot doesn't bear close scrutiny and I have quite a few niggles about ship design, lighting placement & the like. But overall it does a lot of very nice nods to trek lore and tells an entertaining tale.
__________________
|O-bot|-fred
'fred is not dead, fred is resurrected!'
"It is only in the tales humans tell, that the hunters win in the end."
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th May 2009, 00:45     #22
duckmannz
 
Is it just me or did the time travel get put in there because it's easier and to get rid of "hur hur hur, that totally couldn't happen because in series 2 episode 12..." etc.

That would be sad
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th May 2009, 01:02     #23
p01s0n
 
Perf and I saw this tonight, thoroughly enjoyed it in its entirety.
__________________
||hellameke.com Image host of NZG pro's||Tu meke Tu much||
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th May 2009, 01:16     #24
iiNEMESISii
 
just went an saw it And it rocked !!
shatner be damned this ant no Denni crane fantasy!!
loved the new cast and reboots the whole timeline thing again from 25 years ago ?
so yeah it does stop all the nerd raaaage venting
JJ probably had to have an open ended movie for the investers to get another 12 blockbuster series out of it !!!
$$$$$$$ <---this stuff does crazy things to people
__________________
shizzle ma dizzle nizzle
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th May 2009, 01:17     #25
BadNova
 
Saw it tonight on IMAX, enjoyed it a lot

But when Scotty mentioned Admiral Archer, I was worried they were going to do a Scott Bakula cameo...

Last edited by BadNova : 9th May 2009 at 01:19.
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th May 2009, 01:57     #26
iiNEMESISii
 
ahh this brings back memories
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Wyfhz...eature=related
__________________
shizzle ma dizzle nizzle
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th May 2009, 09:44     #27
BoyWonder
 
Absolutely loved it

"I like this ship - it's exciting!"
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th May 2009, 10:41     #28
Rivertrog
 
Loved it.

Hardcore trekkies be damned, this was good entertainment, very little waffle!
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th May 2009, 10:59     #29
Cyberbob
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by duckmannz
Is it just me or did the time travel get put in there because it's easier and to get rid of "hur hur hur, that totally couldn't happen because in series 2 episode 12..." etc.

That would be sad
It was more of a reboot of the series without having to ret con anything, because now it's all an alternative timeline.
__________________
ɹǝʌo sᴉ ǝɯɐƃ ʎɥʇ
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th May 2009, 12:02     #30
BadNova
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rivertrog
Loved it.

Hardcore trekkies be damned, this was good entertainment, very little waffle!
I liked it because it was a) all filled with explosions and action for the new viewers but b) absolutely packed with references for the fans.
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th May 2009, 15:47     #31
[Malks] Pixie
 
Saw it this morning - both of us really enjoyed it.

First time I've been too the movies in years too - I was feeling a little ashamed that Star Trek was what tempted me back but I have none of that now - was well worth it.

Some great laughs, good action, plenty of hat-tips (loved the take off of "Khhhaaannnn") and generally thought it did a great job. I'm not a huge trek fan at all so wasn't worried about the little plot niggles.

Pixie
__________________
Civilised is as civilised does and civilised people walk among us.
  Reply With Quote
Old 9th May 2009, 21:17     #32
Simon K
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Rivertrog
Loved it.

Hardcore trekkies be damned, this was good entertainment, very little waffle!
Same, the technobabble is something that polarises so many people normally.
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th May 2009, 07:06     #33
Nemises
 
not a trekkie here, but I got a bit sucked in by the hype and good reviews, and TBH, thought it was just "ok".
Deserves a repeat screening on blueray when it comes out ...

...dunno, thought it was a bit too shiny and colorful, which, I gues is part of the utopean premise ?...but ...hmm, well dunno...I had hoped to enjoy it more, and I guess that was what spoiled it for me.

...also the fact that it was a starwars clone didnt help...I swear I thougt chewie was gonna make one of his noises in teh medal ceremony at the end there :/
  Reply With Quote
Old 10th May 2009, 22:57     #34
Trigger
Laserman
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Nemises
not a trekkie here, but I got a bit sucked in by the hype and good reviews, and TBH, thought it was just "ok".
it was ok at best. about 15 min of cool action, the rest was shortland street
was there this much drama/love scenes in the og movies? i was hoping for more science fiction, less teenage drama, but maybe i expected too much
__________________
Are you slow? The alleged lie that you might have heard, me saying, allagedly moments ago... That's a parasite that lives in my neck.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th May 2009, 00:15     #35
Dusty
 
Liked - Everything
Disliked - The product placement. ST was never about recognisable conglomerates.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th May 2009, 00:25     #36
Konev
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by BadNova
b) absolutely packed with references for the fans.

in refference to the mining platform





loved the movie, very well put togeather bit of work.

what really cracked me up is after the movie finished i was heading back to the car and behind me i could hear a hardcore trekkie giving his girlfriend the entire back history of the romulans (sp?) and the vulcans, all he got in reply was 'aha, aha, aha, aha, aha'

lots of effort to contain laughter was required.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th May 2009, 01:14     #37
[WanG] Wandarah
 
i give it 4 out of 5 stretched sphincters.
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th May 2009, 01:25     #38
crocos
 
"4 our of 5 stretched sphincters recommend..."
__________________
Ξ √ Ω L U T ↑ ☼ N

وكل يوم كنت تعيش في العبودية
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th May 2009, 09:36     #39
Cyberbob
 
Quote:
Originally Posted by Dusty
Liked - Everything
Disliked - The product placement. ST was never about recognisable conglomerates.
Was there really that much? I think all I noticed was Nokia.

My main dislike was the amount of lensflares, there's pretty much one in every single shot for the first half of the movie. Ended up being pretty distracting when I started counting them all.
__________________
ɹǝʌo sᴉ ǝɯɐƃ ʎɥʇ
  Reply With Quote
Old 11th May 2009, 11:29     #40
buckies
 
Thumbs up

Gonna join the reoccurring theme in this thread and say that the movie pleasantly rocked.

Went in with low expectations, with the thought of being molested by fat trekkie nerds who would obnoxiously bitch throughout the duration of the film. Thankfully, the nerds kept quiet, but I still felt their effects as their lummox form squished past to go toilet and top up on more candy snacks mid way through.

Could have done with better poon or shown some boobies on existing poon. Anyone else get confused trying to figure out how Kirk was fucking the ginger she-hulk with his undies on?

Visual effects warrant watching this at the movies. Was darn good at Embassy. Watching Vulcan collapse into a black hole was awesome.
  Reply With Quote
Reply


Thread Tools

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

vB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Forum Jump



© Copyright NZGames.com 1996-2024
Site paid for by members (love you guys)