Quote:
|
Originally Posted by Ab
Um, exactly which part of the expanding universe theory do you consider to be "shaky"?
|
Shaky was a wrong choice of words. To me the theory of evolution is more believable than the expanding universe theory which is much newer than evolution and was a single event in the past. We can look a see evolution happening today in the present. In my lifetime the scientific origins of the universe have changed from steady state, expanding forever, expanding contracting and I don't know what it is suppose to be doing at the moment. In the context of Wishart's argument it is important that the universe began from nothing. I'm not poo pooing the science but sitting next evolution its not as solid a theory.