View Single Post
Old 27th August 2005, 10:42     #133
Golden Teapot
Love, Actuary
 
Quote:
Originally posted by Ban Midou
an increase of tax later on, or cuts in other services like health where
Yes, you could cut health. Alternatively, you could cut from one of the other tens of thousands of expenditure lines that the Governement has.

You chose to mention "health" (you could have had the same effect by choosing "education" or "law enforcement"). Why? The answers are simple aren't they? First, if you referred to the savings that National have said they will make then you'd sound like a pathetic fool. Second, you're trying to make people believe that the governement is efficent and thus "savings" have to mean "cuts" to essential services.

Cutting the fat out of the Governement sounds like a good idea to me. You disagree, but you're not prepeared to admit what you're actually standing for.

I may be being unfair here. Perhaps you're just a tad on the slow side and don't realise what's going on?
  Reply With Quote